This is the data from which I derive the view that we are now at what I call the 'peak narrative' of intersectionalism:
"Charting The New York Times' Narrative"
source: Chris Menahan, InformationLiberation
"Charting The New York Times' Narrative"
source: Chris Menahan, InformationLiberation
As much as its adherents would want and perhaps imagine it to be so, a utopian ideal of an end to all of life's sufferings, stresses and strains can never be the outcome of applied intersectionality. The goal of its radical followers seems to be to dismantle the functioning institutions, but the ideology is completely absent on ideas with what to replace them (an opportunity, should such a catastrophe occur, a would-be tyrant of any ideology would relish). Whatever social and political direction liberal democratic civilisations take in consequence of this intersectionalist barminess, it is starting to look very much as though it will be played out in the coming months or years. It is my opinion that we are at a zenith of intersectionailist influence from the BS narrative in the mainstream and,
if the ideology is to be rejected and liberal meritocracy and blind justice are to regain traction in the mainstream, then perhaps for many, this story will be one of a few pivotal stories in the coming months
that are 'penny drop', counter narrative moments:
"Caroline Lucas apologises for proposing all-white female emergency cabinet"
source: The Independent
